25-05-2013
Ethical Perspectives
   
 
 Promoting international dialogue between fundamental and applied ethics
 
  Home
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Team
  Information for Authors and Book Reviewers
  Contact Information
  Monograph Series
  Archives
  Ethics.be
 


Recent issue  20/1 (2013)
Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Global Politics and Globalization
(Annelies Decat)
In The Beginning There Was and Will Have Been the World or Who's Afraid of the Nation-State?
(Andréa B. Gill)
Cosmopolitan Ethics from Below
(Gilbert Leung)
Care Drain as an Issue of Global Gender Justice
(Anca Gheaus)
What If We Took Autonomous Recovery Seriously? A Democratic Critique of Contemporary Western Ethical Foreign Policy
(Olivia Umurerwa Rutazibwa)
Obamacare and Conscientious Objection. Some Introductory Thoughts
(Nir Eyal)
Religious Liberty, Conscience, and the Affordable Care Act
(Holly Fernandez Lunch)
Conscience and Health
(Elizabeth Fenton)
Taxation, Conscientious Objection and Religious Freedom
(Annabelle Lever)
Can Moral Integrity Warrant Opposition to Tax-Funded Healthcare?
(Noam Zohar)
Conscientious Objection, Coercion, the Affordable Care Act, and US States
(Glenn Cohen)
The Use and Abuse of Religious Freedom
(Peter Singer)
Book Reviews
(reviewers )
Contributors
 
Ethical Perspectives
Issue : 19/1 (March - 2012)
The Personal is Political. Ethics and Personalized Medicine
Vilhjálmur Arnason
   Page : 103 - 122
  It is argued that the ethical questions and challenges raised by the project of personalizing medicine are not sufficiently addressed without considering the possible effects thereof on our system of healthcare. I argue that the framing of ethical issues in light of the main principles of bioethics, such as autonomy, welfare and even justice, tends to be too narrow and the larger social implications thus tend to be neglected. Among the possible unintended consequences of the project to increase personal responsibility for health is a reduced emphasis on it’s social determinants, for which we are jointly responsible.

This presents important challenges for bioethics, and calls in turn for closer attention to be paid to biopolitics and the social context of bioethical discourse. The conclusion is that the benefits or damage that might result from personalizing medicine will depend no less upon political and policy decisions than on pharmacogenomic developments.
       
 
 
Back  to  Ethical Perspectivescontact© 2013 - Ethical Perspectives - p/a Damiaanplein 9 bus 5306 - 3000 Leuven - Phone +32 (0)16/32.38.29